Antonyms
Antonyms are words belonging to the same part of speech, identical in style, expressing contrary of contradictory notions.
Antonyms
absolute or root antonyms
derivational antonyms
(late - early)
( to please - to displease,
honest - dishonest,
professional - nonprofessional)
different roots
same roots but different affixes
1. Negative prefixes (un-; dis-; non-) form antonyms:
Un-: un true
Dis-: dis like
Non-: non reactive
2. Sometimes they are formed by means of antonymous suffixes -ful and -less
-ful: pain ful
-less: pain less
The antonym of the adjective with the suffix -ful is formed by means of the prefix un- :
success ful – un successful
The antonym of the adjective with the suffix -less is formed with the help of the suffix –ish :
self less - self ish
The same is true about antonyms with negative prefixes
e.g. to man is not an antonym of the word to unman;
to disappoint is not an antonym of the word to appoint .
The difference between derivational and root antonyms is not only in their structure , but in semantics as well.
Derivational antonyms
Absolute
antonyms
express contradictory notions, one of them excludes the other
express contrary notions. If some notions can be arranged in a group of more than two members, the most distant members of the group will be absolute antonyms
e.g. active - inactive
e.g. ugly, plain, good-looking, pretty, beautiful
Leonard Lipka in the book Outline of English Lexicology describes different types of oppositeness, and subdivides them into three types:
- complementarity, e.g. male - female, married – single;
- antonyms, e.g. good – bad
- converseness, e.g. to buy - to sell.
Complementarity
In his classification he describes complementarity in the following way: the denial of the one implies the assertion of the other, and vice versa.
John is not married = John is single
The type of oppositeness is based on yes/no decision. Incompatibility only concerns pairs of lexical units.
Antonyms
It's distinguished from complementarity by being based on different logical relationships . The assertion containing one member implies the negation of the other, but not vice versa.
John is good = John is not bad
John is not good ≠ John is bad
The negation of one term doesn't necessarily implies the assertion of the other.
An important linguistic difference from complementaries is that antonyms are always fully gradable , e.g. hot, warm, tepid, cold.
Converseness
- Converseness is mirror-image relations or functions:
e.g. husband – wife, pupil - teacher, precede - follow, above - below,
before - after etc.
Jonh bought the car from Bill = Bill sold the car to John
2.. Also in the comparative form:
Y is smaller than X = X is larger than Y.
L.Lipka also points out non-binary contrast or many-member lexical sets. Here he points out serially ordered sets, such as
- scales ( hot , warm, tepid, cold, cool );
- colour words ( black , grey, white );
- military ranks (marshal, general, colonel, major, captain etc.)
- gradable examination marks ( excellent , good ,average, fair, poor )
In such sets of words we can have outer and inner pairs of antonyms.
He also points out cycles, such as units of tie:
( spring, summer, autumn, winter )
In this case there are no outermost members.
Not every word in language can have antonyms. This type of opposition can be met in qualitative adjective and their derivatives
e.g. beautiful - ugly,
to beautify - to uglify,
beauty – ugliness
It can be also met in words denoting feelings and states
e.g. respect - scorn, to live - to die,
to respect- to scorn, alive - dead,
respectful – scornful life - death
I t can be also met among words denoting direction in space and time
e.g. here - there, up - down,
now - never, before - after
day - night, early - late etc.
If a word is polysemantic ,
it can have several antonyms
e.g. the word bright has the antonyms:
dim, dull, sad.
Thank you for your attention!